Financial Crimes
We provide strong and compassionate defense for clients facing financial crime allegations like larceny, fraud, embezzlement, identity theft, and more. We have successfully defended clients against financial charges for nearly 30 years.
Get Help TodayLarceny by False Pretenses Defense Attorney Massachusetts
Charged with larceny by false pretenses in Massachusetts? Felony exposure over $1,200, plus restitution. Free 24/7 consultation with defense counsel.

Financial Crime Charges Can Destroy Your Career And Future
Being accused of a financial crime like larceny, fraud, or embezzlement can lead to serious penalties including years in prison. These charges also carry the stigma of being untrustworthy, which can destroy reputations and careers. Defending against financial crime allegations is complex, requiring an attorney with specific skills and experience. Skills and experience we have developed over nearly 30 years in the courtroom.
Financial or “white collar crime” refers to any nonviolent crime that is committed by corporate or government officials or an individual to achieve unlawful commercial gains. It is frightening how often people find themselves in trouble just by a simple mistake, being unaware of the applicable laws or simply being a convenient “fall guy.’ The mistaken belief that such nonviolent crimes, involving business issues, need not be taken seriously has led many people to prison.
Because the law allows prosecutors to rely upon presumptions to prove a person’s intent, these cases can arise in circumstances of innocent, but mistaken, conduct that is misinterpreted by law enforcement investigators. Anyone targeted in such an investigation needs to be represented at the earliest possible moment so that rights and defenses may be preserved and any possibility of ending the investigation without criminal prosecution can be pursued. If you have been charged or are being investigated or questioned regarding such a crime, you need a lawyer. We have nearly three decades of experience in the courtroom, successfully defending good people in their toughest times.
Defense Based on Understanding & Compassion
We have a comprehensive approach to legal defense that addresses both the immediate legal needs and the broader context surrounding a case. We understand that innocent people get accused. We also understand that sometimes there are factors that the police and prosecutors don't pay attention to that may explain what happened, and why. Our team draws on experience with trauma, addiction, and mental health to uncover critical factors that often underlie financial crimes. This enables us to humanize clients, mount the strongest possible defense, and help clients make lasting and positive changes in their lives.
%20(1).jpg)
Over 30 Years Defending Larceny by False Pretenses Charges in Massachusetts Courts
Call (978) 705-4537 for a free consultation available 24/7.
Understanding Your Situation
Call (978) 705-4537 for a free consultation.
Understanding Larceny by False Pretenses Charges in Massachusetts
Massachusetts recognizes five distinct false pretenses statutes under c. 266: larceny by false pretenses (§ 30), elder larceny by false pretenses (§ 30(5)), obtaining signature by false pretenses (§ 31), false pretenses relating to contracts, banking, or credit (§ 33), and inducement to part with property (§ 34). Each shares the same four core elements that the Commonwealth must prove beyond a reasonable doubt: that the defendant made a knowingly false statement of an existing fact, that the defendant acted with intent to defraud, that the alleged victim relied on the false statement, and that the alleged victim transferred property as a result. Each element is heavily contested in most cases. False statements about the future, expressions of opinion, and ordinary salesmanship are not crimes. The major Massachusetts false pretenses statutes are set out below.
Larceny by False Pretenses
The four elements (false statement of existing fact, intent to defraud, reliance, and transfer of property) are the central battleground. Massachusetts courts have long held that a false promise about future conduct is not a false pretense. The statement must concern an existing or past fact, not a prediction or representation about what will happen. Honest puffery, sales optimism, and statements of opinion all fall outside the statute. The line between civil contract dispute and criminal false pretenses is often the central defense question.
Elder Larceny by False Pretenses
Many of these cases involve disputes between family members, romantic partners, or trusted advisors of older relatives. The line between authorized assistance with finances and unauthorized misrepresentation can be unclear. We cover the elder larceny pattern in detail on a separate page.
Obtaining Signature by False Pretenses
The penalty mirrors the larceny by false pretenses penalty under § 30: up to 5 years in state prison or up to 2 years in jail and a fine of up to $25,000 for property over $1,200, or up to 1 year for $1,200 or less. The statute is most often charged where the defendant tricked the alleged victim into signing a contract, deed, check, or other written instrument, often in cases involving real estate, loans, or estate planning. Like other false pretenses charges, the case turns on whether the misrepresentation was about an existing fact rather than about future conduct or opinion.
False Pretenses Relating to Contracts, Banking, or Credit
The statute is most commonly charged in business and lending contexts: false statements made to obtain a line of credit, false collateral representations to secure a loan, or false statements made to induce the discount of commercial paper. The penalty mirrors the larceny statute. As with other false pretenses charges, the line between aggressive negotiating, normal salesmanship, and criminal misrepresentation is often where the case is fought. Where the alleged victim was a sophisticated commercial party with the means to verify representations, the reliance element can be particularly difficult for the Commonwealth to establish.
Inducement to Part with Property by False Pretense
In practice, § 34 is often charged in the alternative with § 30 when prosecutors are uncertain which theory the evidence supports. Many cases that are charged under both end up resolving as straight larceny cases, with the § 34 count dismissed at sentencing. The "intent to defraud" element here, as in every false pretenses statute, requires a specific dishonest purpose at the time of the misrepresentation.
Statutory Exemption Under Section 35
This exemption matters in everyday transactions. A person who walks into a store, claims to be employed when they are not, and buys merchandise on credit has not committed larceny by false pretenses unless the misrepresentation about employment was in a signed writing. The exemption reflects a legislative judgment that ordinary commercial puffery about ability to pay should not be criminalized. It often defeats charges that prosecutors initially file. Where charges are based primarily on a defendant's spoken representations about their financial circumstances, this exemption can resolve the case entirely.
Potential Consequences Under Massachusetts Law
Most larceny by false pretenses cases involving property over $1,200 are felonies carrying up to 5 years in state prison or up to 2 years in jail and a fine of up to $25,000. Cases involving alleged victims aged 60 or older or persons with disabilities, with values over $250, carry up to 10 years in state prison and a fine of up to $50,000. Smaller cases (property of $1,200 or less; elder cases under $250) are misdemeanors. Restitution is essentially always ordered upon conviction for the full amount of the alleged loss.
Beyond direct sentencing, false pretenses convictions are classified as crimes involving moral turpitude and as crimes of dishonesty under Federal Rule of Evidence 609, meaning they remain admissible to impeach credibility for at least 10 years. Professional licenses in finance, real estate, healthcare, education, and any role requiring trust are at serious risk. Federal employment, security clearances, and bonded positions become difficult or impossible. Non-citizens face deportation consequences for false pretenses convictions, particularly where the alleged loss exceeds $10,000, which makes the offense an aggravated felony under federal immigration law. Civil follow-on litigation is common, and many alleged victims pursue civil recovery in addition to or instead of criminal restitution.
A charge is not a conviction. False pretenses cases turn on contested questions of intent, materiality of the alleged misrepresentation, reliance, and the distinction between civil dispute and criminal conduct. Each element has to be proved beyond a reasonable doubt, and proof is often built from documents, witness testimony, and contested credibility judgments that can be challenged.
Possible Defenses Under Massachusetts Law
Statement was about future conduct. False pretenses requires a statement about an existing or past fact. False promises about the future, predictions, expressions of opinion, and forward-looking representations are not crimes. The line between past fact and future conduct is often the central defense question.
Statement was opinion or puffery. Honest sales optimism, statements of opinion, and ordinary commercial puffery are not false pretenses. "This is a great investment" is opinion; "this property has 100 acres" is fact. Massachusetts courts have repeatedly distinguished between the two.
Statutory exemption under § 35. Where the alleged false pretense concerns the purchaser's means, occupation, or financial standing, the case is barred unless the misrepresentation was in a signed writing. Many oral representations about ability to pay, employment, or income fall within this exemption.
No reliance. The alleged victim must have actually relied on the false statement. Where the victim conducted independent investigation, where the misrepresentation was not material to the decision, or where the victim had reason to know the truth, the reliance element fails.
Lack of intent to defraud. Every false pretenses statute requires specific intent to defraud at the time the statement was made. Honest mistake, good faith belief in the truth of statements, evolving understanding of facts, and innocent error all defeat this element.
Civil dispute, not crime. Many cases reflect contractual disputes, business deals gone bad, or family financial disagreements. The line between civil dispute and criminal false pretenses turns on intent, and these cases often belong in civil court rather than criminal court.
Disputed valuation. Where the alleged loss is at or near a felony threshold ($1,200 generally, $250 in elder cases), or near the $10,000 aggravated-felony immigration threshold, contesting valuation can dramatically change the case.
Constitutional violations. Searches, statements, and document seizures during false pretenses investigations must comply with the Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments. Successful suppression motions often dismantle prosecutions.
Charge reduction strategies. Many false pretenses cases can be reduced from felony to misdemeanor, from one larceny theory to another, or from criminal to civil resolution depending on what the evidence supports.
Every case is different. Call (978) 705-4537 to discuss your situation and your options.
If You've Just Been Charged with Larceny by False Pretenses
● Don't talk to investigators from any agency, the alleged victim, or the alleged victim's attorney without a lawyer present, even if you are told this is just an opportunity to clear things up
● Don't sign anything presented by the alleged victim, including general releases, repayment agreements, or admissions, without consulting an attorney
● Don't repay the alleged loss before consulting counsel. Repayment can sometimes be the right strategy, but it must be timed and structured carefully so it does not become evidence of fraudulent intent
● Don't discuss your case with anyone except your attorney, including business partners, family members, or anyone else who might later be interviewed
● Don't destroy or alter records related to the alleged transaction. Spoliation of evidence creates additional charges and converts a defensible case into an obstruction case
● Preserve all relevant records including emails, text messages, contracts, financial records, marketing materials, and any documents that might show the actual content and context of the disputed statements
● Write down everything you remember about the relevant transactions, conversations, and what was actually said about the disputed facts
● Don't post anything about your case, the alleged victim, the investigation, or the disputed transaction on social media
● Contact an experienced Massachusetts false pretenses defense attorney as soon as possible
Call (978) 705-4537 for a free consultation 24/7.
Acting quickly gives your attorney the best chance to engage with prosecutors before formal charges issue, preserve favorable evidence, and build the strongest possible defense.
What to Expect When You Call
● We will listen to your story and answer your questions
● We will explain the specific false pretenses charge and what the Commonwealth must prove
● We will discuss possible defense strategies and resolution options for your specific situation
● We will explain how an investigation might be addressed before formal charges issue
● We will explain the line between civil dispute and criminal false pretenses, and where your case falls
● We will explain our approach and how we can help you through this
● Everything you tell us is confidential
● There is no obligation to hire us
You do not need to have the answers. Just call, and we will take it from there. Phones answered 24/7 by a real person. Free, confidential consultation.
We'll Get You Through the Storm
Call (978) 705-4537 for a free consultation.
Over 30 years of Massachusetts criminal defense experience. Serving Essex County and Eastern Massachusetts including Beverly, Salem, Lynn, Peabody, Gloucester, Newburyport, Lawrence, and Haverhill.




