Fentanyl Charges Defense Attorney Massachusetts
Charged with fentanyl trafficking or possession in Massachusetts? Mandatory minimum 3.5 years state prison at 10 grams. Free 24/7 consultation.
Over 30 Years Defending Fentanyl Charges in Massachusetts Courts
Fentanyl charges in Massachusetts carry the harshest mandatory minimum sentences of any drug case under state law. The trafficking threshold is just 10 grams, and a conviction means at least 3.5 years in state prison, with no possibility of probation, suspended sentence, or early parole. We defend individuals charged with fentanyl offenses in Essex County and throughout Eastern Massachusetts.
Call (978) 705-4537 for a free consultation available 24/7.
Call (978) 705-4537 for a free consultation available 24/7.
Understanding Your Situation
Fentanyl prosecutions move quickly and the stakes are unusually high: the mandatory minimum sentence cannot be reduced by the judge, and traditional dispositions like probation or continuance without a finding are not available. We have defended people facing fentanyl charges for over 30 years in Massachusetts courts.
Call (978) 705-4537 for a free consultation.
Call (978) 705-4537 for a free consultation.
Understanding Fentanyl Charges in Massachusetts
If you are looking at charging documents involving fentanyl, the first thing to understand is that Massachusetts treats fentanyl differently than other controlled substances. The trafficking threshold is set at 10 grams, lower than the 18-gram threshold for heroin and cocaine. Carfentanil, a fentanyl analog hundreds of times more potent, carries trafficking exposure at any quantity. And the statutory restrictions on sentencing remove most of the discretion that exists in other drug cases.
Massachusetts recognizes six distinct categories of fentanyl-related charge under M.G.L. c. 94C: simple possession, possession with intent to distribute, fentanyl trafficking at 10 grams or more, carfentanil trafficking at any quantity, school zone enhancement, and manslaughter by distribution where an overdose results in death. Each category has its own elements, its own penalty structure, and its own defense profile. The major Massachusetts fentanyl charges are set out below.
Massachusetts recognizes six distinct categories of fentanyl-related charge under M.G.L. c. 94C: simple possession, possession with intent to distribute, fentanyl trafficking at 10 grams or more, carfentanil trafficking at any quantity, school zone enhancement, and manslaughter by distribution where an overdose results in death. Each category has its own elements, its own penalty structure, and its own defense profile. The major Massachusetts fentanyl charges are set out below.
Fentanyl Trafficking
Fentanyl trafficking under M.G.L. c. 94C, § 32E(c½) is the most commonly charged fentanyl offense and the most serious. The Commonwealth must prove that the defendant knowingly or intentionally manufactured, distributed, dispensed, or possessed with intent to manufacture, distribute, or dispense a net weight of 10 grams or more of fentanyl, any derivative of fentanyl, or any mixture containing fentanyl, or that the defendant brought such an amount into the Commonwealth.
A conviction carries 3.5 to 20 years in state prison, with a mandatory minimum 3.5 years that no judge can reduce. The "any mixture containing fentanyl" language is critical: the 10-gram threshold is measured by the net weight of the entire mixture, not the weight of the fentanyl itself. A mixture that is mostly cutting agent but contains any fentanyl can hit the 10-gram threshold based on the total weight. This catches many defendants who possessed what they believed was heroin or another opioid that turned out to contain fentanyl as an additive.
A conviction carries 3.5 to 20 years in state prison, with a mandatory minimum 3.5 years that no judge can reduce. The "any mixture containing fentanyl" language is critical: the 10-gram threshold is measured by the net weight of the entire mixture, not the weight of the fentanyl itself. A mixture that is mostly cutting agent but contains any fentanyl can hit the 10-gram threshold based on the total weight. This catches many defendants who possessed what they believed was heroin or another opioid that turned out to contain fentanyl as an additive.
Possession with Intent to Distribute
Where the alleged amount falls below the 10-gram trafficking threshold, fentanyl charges are typically prosecuted as possession with intent to distribute under M.G.L. c. 94C, § 32A as a Class A controlled substance. The Commonwealth must prove possession of fentanyl, knowledge that the substance was a controlled substance, and intent to distribute. Intent to distribute is typically inferred from the quantity, packaging, presence of distribution paraphernalia (scales, baggies, ledgers), large amounts of cash, multiple cell phones, or surveillance evidence.
A first offense for possession with intent under § 32A carries up to 10 years in state prison or 2.5 years in jail and a fine of $1,000 to $10,000. A second or subsequent offense carries 3.5 to 15 years in state prison with a mandatory minimum 3.5 years and a fine of $2,500 to $25,000. The § 32H restrictions on continuance, probation, and parole do not apply to first-offense § 32A as they do to trafficking, which gives this charge meaningfully more sentencing flexibility than a trafficking charge.
A first offense for possession with intent under § 32A carries up to 10 years in state prison or 2.5 years in jail and a fine of $1,000 to $10,000. A second or subsequent offense carries 3.5 to 15 years in state prison with a mandatory minimum 3.5 years and a fine of $2,500 to $25,000. The § 32H restrictions on continuance, probation, and parole do not apply to first-offense § 32A as they do to trafficking, which gives this charge meaningfully more sentencing flexibility than a trafficking charge.
Carfentanil Trafficking
Carfentanil trafficking under M.G.L. c. 94C, § 32E(c¾) addresses the most potent fentanyl analog and applies at any quantity, with no weight threshold. Carfentanil is approximately 100 times more potent than fentanyl and is not approved for any human use. A conviction carries 3.5 to 20 years in state prison with a mandatory minimum 3.5 years, the same penalty range as fentanyl trafficking but without the 10-gram floor.
When the charge is based on a mixture containing carfentanil rather than pure carfentanil, the statute imposes a specific knowledge requirement: the Commonwealth must prove that the defendant had specific knowledge that the mixture contained carfentanil or any derivative of carfentanil. This is a heightened mens rea element. A defendant who possessed what they believed was fentanyl or another opioid, without knowing it contained carfentanil, has not committed carfentanil trafficking even if the substance later tests positive for carfentanil.
When the charge is based on a mixture containing carfentanil rather than pure carfentanil, the statute imposes a specific knowledge requirement: the Commonwealth must prove that the defendant had specific knowledge that the mixture contained carfentanil or any derivative of carfentanil. This is a heightened mens rea element. A defendant who possessed what they believed was fentanyl or another opioid, without knowing it contained carfentanil, has not committed carfentanil trafficking even if the substance later tests positive for carfentanil.
School Zone and Park Enhancement
The school zone enhancement under M.G.L. c. 94C, § 32J adds an additional state prison sentence of 2 to 15 years on top of any underlying drug conviction when the offense occurred within 300 feet of a school during school hours, or within 100 feet of a public park or playground. The enhancement carries its own mandatory minimum 2 years that must be served consecutively after any underlying mandatory minimum. The cumulative effect on a fentanyl trafficking case can be a mandatory minimum 5.5 years in state prison.
The 300-foot measurement is from the school property line, not the school building, and "during school hours" is broadly construed in many decisions. The enhancement is one of the more frequently challenged drug provisions on Fourth Amendment grounds because the location element is often built from imprecise measurement and the prosecution must prove both location and timing beyond a reasonable doubt. Mistaken or speculative location measurements can defeat the enhancement.
The 300-foot measurement is from the school property line, not the school building, and "during school hours" is broadly construed in many decisions. The enhancement is one of the more frequently challenged drug provisions on Fourth Amendment grounds because the location element is often built from imprecise measurement and the prosecution must prove both location and timing beyond a reasonable doubt. Mistaken or speculative location measurements can defeat the enhancement.
Drug-Induced Manslaughter (Overdose Death)
Where a fentanyl distribution leads to an overdose death, prosecutors can charge manslaughter by distribution under M.G.L. c. 94C, § 32K. The Commonwealth must prove that the defendant distributed or dispensed a controlled substance, that the substance was the proximate cause of the death of another person, and that the death resulted from the use of that substance. The penalty includes any sentence for the underlying distribution charge, plus separate manslaughter exposure that can extend the total sentence substantially.
Drug-induced manslaughter cases turn on causation. The Commonwealth must prove the substance the defendant distributed was actually the substance that caused death, not a substance the decedent obtained from another source or had used previously. Toxicology timelines, multiple-substance interactions, and tracing the actual source of the fatal dose are often where these cases are won or lost. These prosecutions have increased significantly during the opioid crisis and require careful coordination between criminal defense counsel and forensic experts.
Drug-induced manslaughter cases turn on causation. The Commonwealth must prove the substance the defendant distributed was actually the substance that caused death, not a substance the decedent obtained from another source or had used previously. Toxicology timelines, multiple-substance interactions, and tracing the actual source of the fatal dose are often where these cases are won or lost. These prosecutions have increased significantly during the opioid crisis and require careful coordination between criminal defense counsel and forensic experts.
Section 32H Sentencing Restrictions
M.G.L. c. 94C, § 32H imposes sentencing restrictions on all trafficking convictions under § 32E that distinguish fentanyl and other trafficking cases from most other Massachusetts crimes. For a trafficking conviction: the case cannot be continued without a finding, the defendant cannot be placed on probation, the sentence cannot be suspended, and the defendant is not eligible for parole until the mandatory minimum has been served in full. Good time deductions that reduce ordinary sentences are largely unavailable.
The practical effect of § 32H is that traditional defense strategies for resolving drug cases (CWOF dispositions, probation negotiations, suspended sentences with treatment requirements) are unavailable on the trafficking charge itself. Defense work in fentanyl trafficking cases shifts almost entirely to one of three fronts: motions to suppress that result in dismissal, charge reduction below the trafficking threshold (to possession with intent under § 32A), or trial. Understanding the § 32H wall is the foundation of any sound fentanyl defense strategy.
The practical effect of § 32H is that traditional defense strategies for resolving drug cases (CWOF dispositions, probation negotiations, suspended sentences with treatment requirements) are unavailable on the trafficking charge itself. Defense work in fentanyl trafficking cases shifts almost entirely to one of three fronts: motions to suppress that result in dismissal, charge reduction below the trafficking threshold (to possession with intent under § 32A), or trial. Understanding the § 32H wall is the foundation of any sound fentanyl defense strategy.
Potential Consequences Under Massachusetts Law
We know you are already worried about what could happen, particularly given the mandatory minimum exposure and the public attention to the opioid crisis. The exact consequences depend on the alleged quantity, whether the substance is fentanyl or carfentanil, whether enhancements apply, and whether the case is part of a broader investigation.
Fentanyl trafficking at 10 grams or more carries a mandatory minimum 3.5 years in state prison and up to 20 years upon conviction. Carfentanil trafficking at any quantity carries the same penalty range. School zone enhancement adds a mandatory minimum 2 years that runs consecutively, producing a possible total mandatory minimum of 5.5 years. Drug-induced manslaughter under § 32K can add additional manslaughter exposure on top of any trafficking conviction. Section 32H prevents a continuance without a finding, probation, suspended sentence, or parole until the mandatory minimum is served.
Beyond direct sentencing, fentanyl convictions are aggravated felonies under federal immigration law regardless of dollar amount, triggering deportation and mandatory detention for non-citizens with no judicial discretion. Federal employment, security clearances, and most professional licenses are foreclosed. Federal fentanyl charges (21 U.S.C. § 841) carry significantly enhanced penalties, including a mandatory minimum 5 years for 40 grams, mandatory 10 years for 400 grams, and a possible mandatory life sentence with prior convictions. Federal prosecutors selectively pick up the most serious cases, particularly those involving distribution networks, interstate trafficking, or fatal overdoses.
A charge is not a conviction. Fentanyl cases turn on contested questions of identification of the substance, weight of the substance, knowledge of the substance's nature, possession (actual or constructive), and the constitutional validity of the stop, search, and seizure. Each element has to be proved beyond a reasonable doubt. Strong defense work, particularly at the motion-to-suppress stage, dismantles many fentanyl prosecutions before they ever reach trial.
Fentanyl trafficking at 10 grams or more carries a mandatory minimum 3.5 years in state prison and up to 20 years upon conviction. Carfentanil trafficking at any quantity carries the same penalty range. School zone enhancement adds a mandatory minimum 2 years that runs consecutively, producing a possible total mandatory minimum of 5.5 years. Drug-induced manslaughter under § 32K can add additional manslaughter exposure on top of any trafficking conviction. Section 32H prevents a continuance without a finding, probation, suspended sentence, or parole until the mandatory minimum is served.
Beyond direct sentencing, fentanyl convictions are aggravated felonies under federal immigration law regardless of dollar amount, triggering deportation and mandatory detention for non-citizens with no judicial discretion. Federal employment, security clearances, and most professional licenses are foreclosed. Federal fentanyl charges (21 U.S.C. § 841) carry significantly enhanced penalties, including a mandatory minimum 5 years for 40 grams, mandatory 10 years for 400 grams, and a possible mandatory life sentence with prior convictions. Federal prosecutors selectively pick up the most serious cases, particularly those involving distribution networks, interstate trafficking, or fatal overdoses.
A charge is not a conviction. Fentanyl cases turn on contested questions of identification of the substance, weight of the substance, knowledge of the substance's nature, possession (actual or constructive), and the constitutional validity of the stop, search, and seizure. Each element has to be proved beyond a reasonable doubt. Strong defense work, particularly at the motion-to-suppress stage, dismantles many fentanyl prosecutions before they ever reach trial.
Possible Defenses Under Massachusetts Law
Right now this may feel hopeless given the mandatory minimum sentences and the § 32H restrictions. There are real defenses available across the entire fentanyl category, and the most important defense work happens before trial. Possible defenses include:
Motion to suppress. Searches that produce fentanyl, statements made during arrest or interrogation, and any evidence developed during a stop must comply with the Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments. Successful suppression motions frequently dismantle fentanyl prosecutions where the case depends on improperly obtained evidence. Motions to suppress are the single most important defense step in most fentanyl cases.
Lack of possession. The Commonwealth must prove possession, either actual (on the defendant's person) or constructive (in a place where the defendant had the ability and intent to control). Where the substance was found in a shared vehicle, common area, or location with multiple potential owners, the constructive possession element fails without additional evidence connecting the defendant to the drugs.
Lack of knowledge. The Commonwealth must prove the defendant knew the substance was a controlled substance. For carfentanil cases, the burden is heightened: the Commonwealth must prove specific knowledge that a mixture contained carfentanil. Defendants who believed they possessed something else, or who had no reason to know what the substance was, have a real defense.
Disputed weight. The 10-gram threshold for fentanyl trafficking is the line between trafficking exposure (mandatory minimum 3.5 years, no probation) and possession with intent (no mandatory minimum, probation possible). Where the weight is at or near the threshold, contesting laboratory testing, packaging weight, moisture content, and net-versus-gross weight can drop the case below trafficking. This is one of the most consequential defense moves available.
Charge reduction below the trafficking threshold. Where suppression is unsuccessful and weight is not contestable, negotiating reduction from § 32E(c½) trafficking to § 32A possession with intent eliminates the mandatory minimum and opens the door to traditional dispositions. This is often the highest-value defense strategy when the underlying evidence is strong.
Lab and chain of custody challenges. Drug testing relies on laboratory analysis. Mishandled samples, improper testing protocols, contaminated equipment, falsified results, and gaps in the chain of custody have all produced dismissals in Massachusetts drug cases. The Hinton and Farak laboratory scandals demonstrated that substantial drug evidence can be invalidated by proper investigation of testing procedures.
Causation defense for manslaughter. For § 32K manslaughter charges, the Commonwealth must prove the defendant's distribution was the proximate cause of death. Other substances in the decedent's system, alternative sources of the fatal dose, prior drug use, and underlying medical conditions can all defeat causation.
Distance and timing defenses for school zone. The school zone enhancement requires the offense to occur within 300 feet of a school during school hours, or within 100 feet of a park or playground. Inaccurate measurements, contested timing, and challenges to what qualifies as a covered location frequently defeat the enhancement.
Confidential informant challenges. Many fentanyl investigations rely on confidential informants. Where the informant's reliability cannot be established, where the informant has motive to fabricate, or where the prosecution refuses to disclose informant information, motions to compel disclosure or motions to suppress can produce dismissals.
Constitutional violations. Beyond the standard motion to suppress, fentanyl cases often involve wiretaps, GPS tracking, prolonged surveillance, and joint state-federal investigations that can violate constitutional protections. Each procedural step is subject to challenge.
Every case is different. Call (978) 705-4537 to discuss your situation and your options.
Motion to suppress. Searches that produce fentanyl, statements made during arrest or interrogation, and any evidence developed during a stop must comply with the Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments. Successful suppression motions frequently dismantle fentanyl prosecutions where the case depends on improperly obtained evidence. Motions to suppress are the single most important defense step in most fentanyl cases.
Lack of possession. The Commonwealth must prove possession, either actual (on the defendant's person) or constructive (in a place where the defendant had the ability and intent to control). Where the substance was found in a shared vehicle, common area, or location with multiple potential owners, the constructive possession element fails without additional evidence connecting the defendant to the drugs.
Lack of knowledge. The Commonwealth must prove the defendant knew the substance was a controlled substance. For carfentanil cases, the burden is heightened: the Commonwealth must prove specific knowledge that a mixture contained carfentanil. Defendants who believed they possessed something else, or who had no reason to know what the substance was, have a real defense.
Disputed weight. The 10-gram threshold for fentanyl trafficking is the line between trafficking exposure (mandatory minimum 3.5 years, no probation) and possession with intent (no mandatory minimum, probation possible). Where the weight is at or near the threshold, contesting laboratory testing, packaging weight, moisture content, and net-versus-gross weight can drop the case below trafficking. This is one of the most consequential defense moves available.
Charge reduction below the trafficking threshold. Where suppression is unsuccessful and weight is not contestable, negotiating reduction from § 32E(c½) trafficking to § 32A possession with intent eliminates the mandatory minimum and opens the door to traditional dispositions. This is often the highest-value defense strategy when the underlying evidence is strong.
Lab and chain of custody challenges. Drug testing relies on laboratory analysis. Mishandled samples, improper testing protocols, contaminated equipment, falsified results, and gaps in the chain of custody have all produced dismissals in Massachusetts drug cases. The Hinton and Farak laboratory scandals demonstrated that substantial drug evidence can be invalidated by proper investigation of testing procedures.
Causation defense for manslaughter. For § 32K manslaughter charges, the Commonwealth must prove the defendant's distribution was the proximate cause of death. Other substances in the decedent's system, alternative sources of the fatal dose, prior drug use, and underlying medical conditions can all defeat causation.
Distance and timing defenses for school zone. The school zone enhancement requires the offense to occur within 300 feet of a school during school hours, or within 100 feet of a park or playground. Inaccurate measurements, contested timing, and challenges to what qualifies as a covered location frequently defeat the enhancement.
Confidential informant challenges. Many fentanyl investigations rely on confidential informants. Where the informant's reliability cannot be established, where the informant has motive to fabricate, or where the prosecution refuses to disclose informant information, motions to compel disclosure or motions to suppress can produce dismissals.
Constitutional violations. Beyond the standard motion to suppress, fentanyl cases often involve wiretaps, GPS tracking, prolonged surveillance, and joint state-federal investigations that can violate constitutional protections. Each procedural step is subject to challenge.
Every case is different. Call (978) 705-4537 to discuss your situation and your options.
If You've Just Been Charged with a Fentanyl Offense
If you have just been arrested, served with a target letter, or had your home or vehicle searched, take a breath. The most important defense work happens early in fentanyl cases. Here is what you need to do right now.
● Don't talk to police or to any state or federal investigator, including DEA, ATF, FBI, State Police, or local detectives, without a lawyer present. Anything you say will be used to support charging decisions and at trial
● Don't consent to additional searches of your home, vehicle, phone, or any other property. Police may continue investigation after the initial arrest, and your consent removes the protections of the Fourth Amendment
● Don't discuss your case with anyone except your attorney, including cellmates, family members, romantic partners, or anyone whose communications might later be subpoenaed or recorded
● Don't destroy or alter evidence of any kind. Spoliation creates separate obstruction charges and worsens the underlying case substantially
● Don't make any statements on jail phone lines or to other inmates. All jail calls are recorded and routinely used by prosecutors
● Preserve all relevant records that might be helpful, including communications, financial records, employment records, and prescription records that might explain the presence of any substance
● Document the search as best you can, including who was present, what was said, what was seized, when officers entered and left, and whether you were shown a warrant
● Don't post anything about your case, your arrest, drugs, or your finances on social media
● Contact an experienced Massachusetts fentanyl defense attorney as soon as possible. Bail, conditions of release, and early defense investigation all begin in the first hours and days after charges are filed
Call (978) 705-4537 — we answer 24/7.
Acting quickly gives your attorney time to investigate the search and arrest, identify suppression issues, contest weight and laboratory analysis, address bail and conditions of release, and build the strongest possible defense.
● Don't talk to police or to any state or federal investigator, including DEA, ATF, FBI, State Police, or local detectives, without a lawyer present. Anything you say will be used to support charging decisions and at trial
● Don't consent to additional searches of your home, vehicle, phone, or any other property. Police may continue investigation after the initial arrest, and your consent removes the protections of the Fourth Amendment
● Don't discuss your case with anyone except your attorney, including cellmates, family members, romantic partners, or anyone whose communications might later be subpoenaed or recorded
● Don't destroy or alter evidence of any kind. Spoliation creates separate obstruction charges and worsens the underlying case substantially
● Don't make any statements on jail phone lines or to other inmates. All jail calls are recorded and routinely used by prosecutors
● Preserve all relevant records that might be helpful, including communications, financial records, employment records, and prescription records that might explain the presence of any substance
● Document the search as best you can, including who was present, what was said, what was seized, when officers entered and left, and whether you were shown a warrant
● Don't post anything about your case, your arrest, drugs, or your finances on social media
● Contact an experienced Massachusetts fentanyl defense attorney as soon as possible. Bail, conditions of release, and early defense investigation all begin in the first hours and days after charges are filed
Call (978) 705-4537 — we answer 24/7.
Acting quickly gives your attorney time to investigate the search and arrest, identify suppression issues, contest weight and laboratory analysis, address bail and conditions of release, and build the strongest possible defense.
“I would absolutely recommend Ernie to anyone.”
He was more than just my lawyer. He was my guardian angel during a very scary and desperate time in my life. He walked with me every step of the way and looked out for my best interest at every twist and turn. He stayed available seven days a week and within moments of my reaching out to him. I will be indebted to him forever. I knew I was in safe hands even though my matter kept me in constant fear. He gave me the courage to keep pushing forward and spent countless hours cheerleading me through an unspeakable experience.
Diane
"Attorney Stone was excellent."
He was extremely knowledgeable and knew his way around the Diversion Program and the Court. He gave us all the information and potential results upfront. He explained the entire process to us from start to finish and he mapped out a plan of action that resulted in a favorable outcome for my child. I would recommend Attorney Stone 100 percent. Thanks to him my child has no criminal record.
Lisa
"I knew Ernie was the real deal."
I knew the moment I spoke to Ernie on the phone he was the real deal. He made us feel at ease during a very stressful time and fought for us. We won our case because of his perseverance and professionalism. He’s just a really good person who’s in your corner fighting for you. Thanks Ernie you’re the best!!!!
Cheryl
"I can't say enough about Ernie and his team. "
They helped our family navigate a very delicate and complicated legal situation. We couldn't be more pleased with the outcome. And Ernie's down-to-earth demeanor helped us feel like we were being listened to and never being talked down to. I would highly recommend Ernie, as I am certain he would do his absolute best to achieve a best-case-scenario outcome for every single one of his clients.
R. H.
"Much love and appreciation to this group"
I would recommend them to anyone. From the first call I knew this was the right choice. Ernie kept my best interests in mind when representing me with results better than expected! I can’t thank them enough. Special shout-out to Joanne who is truly the nicest person. Their whole vibe was homely like family. Much love and appreciation to this group... even the 4 legged nugget running around their office.
A. R.
"I was in good hands..."
Before working with Ernie I was very unaware of how my future would be and felt alone in my case; that all changed once I had Ernie Stone as my lawyer. Very professional, very reassuring, very caring and helpful with any questions you may have. I can definitely say that there was always a smile on their faces and made me feel welcomed and well taken care of. I had no doubt in mind that I was in good hands and that I was going to be alright.
R. J.
What to Expect When You Call
We know this call is hard to make. You may feel scared by the mandatory minimum sentences you have read about, worried about your family, or unsure of what to say. That is okay. You do not need to have the right words.
● We will listen to your story and answer your questions
● We will explain the specific fentanyl charge and what the Commonwealth must prove
● We will discuss possible defense strategies, particularly motions to suppress and weight challenges
● We will explain how Section 32H affects your case and where the real defense leverage exists
● We will explain how charge reduction below the trafficking threshold could change your exposure
● We will explain our approach and how we can help you through this
● Everything you tell us is confidential
● There is no obligation to hire us
You do not need to have the answers. Just call, and we will take it from there. Phones answered 24/7 by a real person. Free, confidential consultation.
● We will listen to your story and answer your questions
● We will explain the specific fentanyl charge and what the Commonwealth must prove
● We will discuss possible defense strategies, particularly motions to suppress and weight challenges
● We will explain how Section 32H affects your case and where the real defense leverage exists
● We will explain how charge reduction below the trafficking threshold could change your exposure
● We will explain our approach and how we can help you through this
● Everything you tell us is confidential
● There is no obligation to hire us
You do not need to have the answers. Just call, and we will take it from there. Phones answered 24/7 by a real person. Free, confidential consultation.
We'll Get You Through the Storm
Fentanyl charges demand experienced legal representation, particularly given the mandatory minimum sentences. We can help you through this storm.
Call (978) 705-4537 for a free consultation.
Over 30 years of Massachusetts criminal defense experience. Serving Essex County and Eastern Massachusetts including Beverly, Salem, Lynn, Peabody, Gloucester, Newburyport, Lawrence, and Haverhill.
Call (978) 705-4537 for a free consultation.
Over 30 years of Massachusetts criminal defense experience. Serving Essex County and Eastern Massachusetts including Beverly, Salem, Lynn, Peabody, Gloucester, Newburyport, Lawrence, and Haverhill.
We'll Get You Through the Storm
Contact our team today for a free consultation. We are available 24/7.
